Ask a Teacher



what are the arguments to say against sustainable development in a debate ?

John baden views the notion of sustainable development as dangerous because the consequences have unknown effects. He writes: "In economy like in ecology, the interdependence rule applies. Isolated actions are impossible. 

A policy which is not carefully enough thought will carry along various perverse and adverse effects for the ecology as much as for the economy. 

Many suggestions to save our environment and to promote a model of 'sustainable development' risk indeed leading to reverse effects.

" Moreover, he evokes the bounds of public action which are underlined by the public choice theory: the quest by politicians of their own interests, lobby pressure, partial disclosure etc. 

He develops his critique by noting the vagueness of the expression, which can cover anything .

 It is a gateway to interventionist proceedings which can be against the principle of freedom and without proven efficacy. 
Against this notion, he is a proponent of private property to impel the producers and the consumers to save the natural resources.

 According to Baden, “the improvement of environment quality depends on the market economy and the existence of legitimate and protected property rights.” They enable the effective practice of personal responsibility and the development of mechanisms to protect the environment. The State can in this con1.text “create conditions which encourage the people to save the environment


comments powered by Disqus